[Gluster-users] wrong size displayed with df after upgrade to 3.12.6

[Stefan Solbrig]

Dear all,

I have a problem with df after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6
All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used.
gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all devices.
However, df does not show the correct glusterfs volume size.
It seems to me that it "forgets" one brick. Although all bricks are used when I'm writing files.

best wishes,
Stefan


details:

[***@pcph00131 glusterfs]# gluster v status all detail
Status of volume: glurch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv1osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 236.4TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv2osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv3osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv4osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 231.0TB

[***@pcph00131 glusterfs]# mount | grep gluster
qloginx:/glurch.rdma on /glurch type fuse.glusterfs (rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,max_read=131072)

[***@pcph00131 glusterfs]# df -h /glurch
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
qloginx:/glurch.rdma 618T 363T 256T 59% /glurch

## df -h should show ~ 800T but only shows ~600T.

[Nithya Balachandran]

Hi Stefan,

There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be
running into this. Please take a look at [1] and try out the workaround
provided in the comments.


Regards,
Nithya



[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Post by Stefan Solbrig
Dear all,
I have a problem with df after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6
All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used.
gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all devices.
However, df does not show the correct glusterfs volume size.
It seems to me that it "forgets" one brick. Although all bricks are used
when I'm writing files.
best wishes,
Stefan
Status of volume: glurch
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv1osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 236.4TB
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv2osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv3osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv4osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 231.0TB
qloginx:/glurch.rdma on /glurch type fuse.glusterfs
(rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,max_read=131072)
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
qloginx:/glurch.rdma 618T 363T 256T 59% /glurch
## df -h should show ~ 800T but only shows ~600T.
--
Dr. Stefan Solbrig
UniversitÀt Regensburg, FakultÀt fÌr Physik,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
Tel [phone]
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Stefan Solbrig]

Dear Nithya,

Thank you so much. This fixed the problem immediately.

best wishes,
Stefan
--
Dr. Stefan Solbrig
UniversitÀt Regensburg, FakultÀt fÌr Physik,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
Tel [phone]

Post by Nithya Balachandran
Hi Stefan,
There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. Please take a look at [1] and try out the workaround provided in the comments.
Regards,
Nithya
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260>
Dear all,
I have a problem with df after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6
All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used.
gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all devices.
However, df does not show the correct glusterfs volume size.
It seems to me that it "forgets" one brick. Although all bricks are used when I'm writing files.
best wishes,
Stefan
Status of volume: glurch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv1osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 236.4TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv2osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv3osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv4osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space : 231.0TB
qloginx:/glurch.rdma on /glurch type fuse.glusterfs (rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,max_read=131072)
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
qloginx:/glurch.rdma 618T 363T 256T 59% /glurch
## df -h should show ~ 800T but only shows ~600T.
--
Dr. Stefan Solbrig
UniversitÀt Regensburg, FakultÀt fÌr Physik,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
Tel [phone]
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>

[Paolo Margara]

Dear all,

I encountered the same issue, I saw that this is fixed in 3.12.7 but I
cannot find this release in the main repo (centos storage SIG), only in
the test one.

What is the expectation to see this release available into the main repo?


Greetings,

    Paolo

Post by Stefan Solbrig
Dear Nithya,
Thank you so much.  This fixed the problem immediately. 
best wishes,
Stefan
-- 
Dr. Stefan Solbrig
UniversitÀt Regensburg, FakultÀt fÌr Physik,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
Tel [phone]

Am 09.03.2018 um 09:47 schrieb Nithya Balachandran
Hi Stefan,
There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you
may be running into this. Please take a look at [1] and try out the
workaround provided in the comments.
Regards,
Nithya
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260>
Dear all,
I have a problem with df  after I upgraded from 3.12.4 to 3.12.6
All four bricks are shown als online, and all bricks are being used.
gluster v stats shows the correct sizes for all devices.
However,  df  does not show the correct glusterfs volume size.
It seems to me that it "forgets" one brick.  Although all bricks
are used when I'm writing files.
best wishes,
Stefan
Status of volume: glurch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick                : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv1osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space     : 236.4TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick                : Brick qloginx:/gl/lv2osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space     : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick                : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv3osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space     : 177.3TB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick                : Brick gluster2x:/gl/lv4osb06/glurchbrick
Total Disk Space     : 231.0TB
qloginx:/glurch.rdma on /glurch type fuse.glusterfs
(rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,max_read=131072)
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
qloginx:/glurch.rdma  618T  363T  256T  59% /glurch
## df -h should show ~ 800T but only shows ~600T.
--
Dr. Stefan Solbrig
UniversitÀt Regensburg, FakultÀt fÌr Physik,
93040 Regensburg, Germany
Tel [phone]
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users