Discussion:
[Gluster-users] new Gluster cluster: 3.10 vs 3.12
Anatoliy Dmytriyev
2018-02-23 15:38:28 UTC
Permalink
Hi

We are planning to install new gluster cluster and I am wondering which
gluster LTM version will you suggest to install: 3.10 or 3.12 in terms
of stability, performance and bugs free version. It will be used in a
production environment and we do not plan to downtime it often -
therefore, stability and performance are important for us.
Maybe my question is a little bit naive but in any software development
we have more and less stable versions.
I see many complains about 3.12.x in this mailing list and it looks like
3.12 has some serious issues. Is it correct?


Best regards,
Anatoliy
Vlad Kopylov
2018-02-24 02:45:31 UTC
Permalink
http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2018-February/033532.html
Post by Anatoliy Dmytriyev
Hi
We are planning to install new gluster cluster and I am wondering which
gluster LTM version will you suggest to install: 3.10 or 3.12 in terms of
stability, performance and bugs free version. It will be used in a
production environment and we do not plan to downtime it often - therefore,
stability and performance are important for us.
Maybe my question is a little bit naive but in any software development we
have more and less stable versions.
I see many complains about 3.12.x in this mailing list and it looks like
3.12 has some serious issues. Is it correct?
Best regards,
Anatoliy
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Ingard Mevåg
2018-02-26 21:26:13 UTC
Permalink
After discussing with Xavi in #gluster-dev we found out that we could
eliminate the slow lstats by disabling disperse.eager-lock.
There is an open issue here :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546732
Anatoliy Dmytriyev
2018-02-26 21:41:49 UTC
Permalink
Hi Vlad and Ingard,

Thanks a lot for the replies.

Regards,
Anatoliy
After discussing with Xavi in #gluster-dev we found out that we could eliminate the slow lstats by disabling disperse.eager-lock.
There is an open issue here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546732 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546732>
Vlad Kopylov
2018-02-27 01:44:03 UTC
Permalink
Thanks!
Post by Ingard Mevåg
After discussing with Xavi in #gluster-dev we found out that we could
eliminate the slow lstats by disabling disperse.eager-lock.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546732
Loading...